On 1/5/10 5:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
More concretely, this means that combined with the rules coming from
HTTP a SYNTAX_ERR exception would be raised for the value argument if
one of the characters has a code point larger than U+00FF, if the code
point is U+007F, or if the code point is smaller than U+0020 but is not
U+0009. If this is all ok the lower bytes are collected as the new
header value.

Does this sound acceptable to implementors?

Apart from the obvious worry of switching away from a behavior that the vast majority of UAs currently implement, with the ensuing potential for website breakage, sounds fine...

-Boris


Reply via email to