[comments below] On 2010/03/27 18:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Thanks Felix, I will update the schema. However, the BIDI spec warns, for security reasons, to avoid the overrides so I didn't include them into our spec. Should I put lro and rlo into the spec regardless? the spec now contains a note about this in the dir section: Note: Under the guidance of the [BIDI] specification, the values that would allow directional overrides in this specifications, namely Left-to-Right Override (LRO) and Right-to-Left Override (RLO), have deliberately been left out of this specification because of security concerns (see [UTR36]). Authors wanting to override the [BIDI] algorithm can do so by using [XML] entities and the appropriate Unicode directional markers.
Reading this note, it seems to make NO sense whatever for me to leave out the lro/rlo values. Essentially, the Note tells you that there is a security problem that apparently was addressed, and then it goes on to tell you how to circumvent the solution. Or did I get something wrong?
Regards, Martin. -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp
