On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Felix Sasaki <felix.sas...@fh-potsdam.de> wrote: > > > 2010/3/27 Marcos Caceres <marc...@opera.com> >> >> >> On Mar 27, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki <felix.sas...@fh-potsdam.de> >> wrote: >> >> The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc >> is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at >> >> elem.author = element author { >> attr.xmllang?, >> attr.itsdir?, >> attribute href { xsd:anyURI }?, >> attribute email { xsd:string { pattern="....@.+" } }?, >> text? >> } >> >> I think you need to rename attr.itsdir to attr.dir , and change >> attr.itsdir = attribute its:dir { "ltr" | "rtl" | "lro" | "rlo" } >> to >> attr.dir = attribute dir { "ltr" | "rtl" | "lro" | "rlo" } >> >> >> Thanks Felix, I will update the schema. However, the BIDI spec warns, for >> security reasons, to avoid the overrides so I didn't include them into our >> spec. Should I put lro and rlo into the spec regardless? > > You mean in the schema, right? No, you can leave them out - so attr.dir = > attribute dir { "ltr" | "rtl" } is fine.
For the sake of record keeping, the above has been integrated into the schema with the addition of the overrides: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/common.rnc The spec also reflects this: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-dir-attribute -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
