On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-)
I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting
to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect
are in the specification. send() can be overloaded as per usual.
Currently the proposal for the response member is responseBody which
nicely maps to HTTP entity body.
...
It does, but doesn't it clash with responseBody in Microsoft's ActiveX
control?
(<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534368%28v=VS.85%29.aspx>)
Best regards, Julian
