On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> ... >> Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-) >> >> I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting >> to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect >> are in the specification. send() can be overloaded as per usual. >> Currently the proposal for the response member is responseBody which >> nicely maps to HTTP entity body. >> ... > > It does, but doesn't it clash with responseBody in Microsoft's ActiveX > control? > (<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534368%28v=VS.85%29.aspx>)
Mozilla's experimental name is "mozResponseArrayBuffer", so perhaps to avoid collisions the spec could call it responseArrayBuffer. -Ken
