From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 5:34 PM
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Pablo Castro >> <pablo.cas...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> > We discussed evictable stores some time ago and captured it in bug 11350 >> > [1], but I haven't seen further discussion on it and it hasn't gone into >> > the spec. I'm curious on where folks are with this? Should we move it to >> > v2? Should we just allow UAs to have their own policy around eviction >> > (back at TPAC it seemed folks had reasonable but different strategies for >> > handling when to allow websites to use storage already). >> >> I think this is a very interesting feature, but one that I'd prefer to >> move to a version 2 as it isn't a required feature and is one that >> seems easy to "retrofit". >> >> / Jonas The feature is already captured in the wiki page that tracks future features [1]. So I guess we can just resolve the bug as "later". Jeremy, the bug is currently assigned to you, were you doing work on it or should I just resolve it? Thanks -pablo [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures
