From: dgro...@google.com [mailto:dgro...@google.com] On Behalf Of David Grogan Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 1:01 PM
>> We (chrome) are still having internal discussions about evictable vs >> non-evictable storage; we're on board with worrying about this in v2. >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Pablo Castro >> <pablo.cas...@microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> > We discussed evictable stores some time ago and captured it in bug >> >> > 11350 [1], but I haven't seen further discussion on it and it hasn't >> >> > gone into the spec. I'm curious on where folks are with this? Should we >> >> > move it to v2? Should we just allow UAs to have their own policy around >> >> > eviction (back at TPAC it seemed folks had reasonable but different >> >> > strategies for handling when to allow websites to use storage already). >> >> I think this is a very interesting feature, but one that I'd prefer to >> >> move to a version 2 as it isn't a required feature and is one that >> >> seems easy to "retrofit". >> >> >> >> / Jonas Got it. I postponed the bug.
