We (chrome) are still having internal discussions about evictable vs non-evictable storage; we're on board with worrying about this in v2.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Pablo Castro > <pablo.cas...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > We discussed evictable stores some time ago and captured it in bug 11350 > [1], but I haven't seen further discussion on it and it hasn't gone into the > spec. I'm curious on where folks are with this? Should we move it to v2? > Should we just allow UAs to have their own policy around eviction (back at > TPAC it seemed folks had reasonable but different strategies for handling > when to allow websites to use storage already). > > I think this is a very interesting feature, but one that I'd prefer to > move to a version 2 as it isn't a required feature and is one that > seems easy to "retrofit". > > / Jonas > >
