Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-progress-events-20110809/
Section 2.1:
"If this is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start
the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a private method
bar() it could be named FooBar() to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized
bar()."
This sentence in hard to read and unclear. Please rephrase/fix it.
Section 4.2:
It should indicate what the requirements for other specifications are to
define properly the use of these events.
Section 4.3:
Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they are
dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for consistency
in the web platform, wouldn't it?
Regards,
Cyril
--
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.wp.institut-telecom.fr/
