Cyril - unless we hear otherwise from you, we will assume you are
satisfied with the way your comments have been addressed:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/
Anne - assuming Cyril is agreeable with the way his comments were
addressed, please update the ED to reflect a CR publication (e.g. add CR
exit criteria you used in rev 1.25) and notify me when you are done so I
can start a CfC to publish a CR.
-Thanks, AB
On 8/16/11 7:54 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:06:25 +0200, Cyril Concolato
<[email protected]> wrote:
The sentence is so unreadable that it's hard to suggest something. It
starts with a general statement but ends with an example. I think it
should be split in two: general statement with a full sentence (now
it seems to end at "letter" ?) and then add the example. Also add
"to" before "prefix" and "start".
Fair enough, I dropped it. Progress Events is so small anyway and the
specification it depends upon (DOM Core) already has clearer text on
extensibility.
There are no requirements.
When reading that: "The editor is encouraged to define it in a way
consistent with this", it did not seem so.
Well there are no specific requirements. If other editors do it wrong
that will be pointed out, but since use can vary wildly I doubt that
will happen much.
Because it very much depends on the context.
Example ?
Cross-origin XMLHttpRequest versus same-origin XMLHttpRequest versus
the HTML application cache feature.
