On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:33 +0200, Cyril Concolato
<cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:
Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-progress-events-20110809/
Section 2.1:
"If this is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some
way and start the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo
wants to add a private method bar() it could be named FooBar() to
prevent clashes with a potential future standardized bar()."
This sentence in hard to read and unclear. Please rephrase/fix it.
Suggestions?
Section 4.2:
It should indicate what the requirements for other specifications are
to define properly the use of these events.
There are no requirements.
Section 4.3:
Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they
are dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for
consistency in the web platform, wouldn't it?
Because it very much depends on the context.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
