On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:21:34 +0100, Arun Ranganathan
<[email protected]> wrote:
Adrian: I'm willing to relax this. I suppose it *is* inconsistent to
insist on 36 chars when we don't insist on UUID. But I suspect when it
comes time to making blob: a registered protocol (it was discussed on
the IETF/URI listserv), the lack of MUSTs will be a sticking point.
We'll take that as it comes, though :)
I do not really see why Chrome cannot simply use UUID as well. It's not
exactly rocket science. It seems that is the only sticking point to just
having the same type of URLs across the board.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/