On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:21:34 +0100, Arun Ranganathan < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Adrian: I'm willing to relax this. I suppose it *is* inconsistent to >> insist on 36 chars when we don't insist on UUID. But I suspect when it >> comes time to making blob: a registered protocol (it was discussed on the >> IETF/URI listserv), the lack of MUSTs will be a sticking point. We'll take >> that as it comes, though :) >> > > I do not really see why Chrome cannot simply use UUID as well. It's not > exactly rocket science. It seems that is the only sticking point to just > having the same type of URLs across the board. The consistency and predictability of having UUIDs across the board could prove useful. > > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > >
