On Aug 1, 2012, at 21:26 , Glenn Adams wrote: > So? Why should lazy blob be specific to HTTP specific semantics when an > arbitrary URL is not specific to HTTP?
No one said that they would have to be HTTP specific, but I agree with Florian that I don't see how it could apply to WS. It could, for instance, be made to work fine with FTP or similar resource retrieval protocols. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
