On 8/2/12 2:29 PM, "Robin Berjon" <ro...@berjon.com> wrote:
>On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote: >> On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <gl...@zewt.org> wrote: >>> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"? It's a confused and confusing >>> phrase. Blobs are "lazy" by design. >> >> Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this >> problem in a more meaningful way. > >Actually, you need both to be accurate. With the current stack you can >have lazy blobs, and you can have remote blobs, but you can't have both >at the same time. If we're going to be strict about naming this, we're >talking about remote lazy blobs. What's a "remote blob" in the current stack? --tobie
