On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote: > On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <gl...@zewt.org> wrote: >> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"? It's a confused and confusing >> phrase. Blobs are "lazy" by design. > > Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this > problem in a more meaningful way.
Actually, you need both to be accurate. With the current stack you can have lazy blobs, and you can have remote blobs, but you can't have both at the same time. If we're going to be strict about naming this, we're talking about remote lazy blobs. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
