On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ms2ger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I object to this publication because of this change: > >> > >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/2341e31323a4 > >> > >> pushed with a misleading commit message. > > > > since you don't say what is misleading, and since commit messages are > > irrelevant for W3C process, this objection is immaterial > > Ms2ger objected to the change, not the commit message, so your > objection to the objection is misplaced. > > However, the commit message isn't long, so it's not difficult to > puzzle out what ey might be referring to. In this case, it's the > implication that changing a bunch of normative references from WHATWG > specs to W3C copies of the specs is somehow necessary "according to > pubrules". > Then whomever ms2ger is should say so. In any case, there is no reason to reference a WHATWG document if there is a W3C counterpart.
