On 12/02/2012 12:07 PM, Jungkee Song wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, James Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
Sure there is if the W3C version is stale, as is the case here.
I don't think it's a technical issue to discuss. There should be
corresponding publication rules.
Art, Charles, Doug,
Can you help clarifying which links we have to use?
In the proposed version, I've changed the links to the following specs:
- [CORS], [DOM], [DOMPS], [HTML] from the WHATWG version to the latest
W3C TR doc.
- [FILEAPI], [PROGRESSEVENTS], [WEBIDL] from the latest W3C ED to the
latest W3C TR doc.
Please revert all those changes.
Thank you
Ms2ger
