On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Reitbauer, Alois <alois.reitba...@compuware.com> wrote: > The conversations this week were very helpful in deciding how to move > forward. I second Jatinder's idea that we come up with a specification that > describes in details what we need. We should also treat it as a separate > specification. If we then see that it has enough commonalities with XHR and > does not introduce unnecessary complexity we can still merge it. I also > think that this is the most efficient way to move forward here.
It's not entirely clear to me how we moved from "we need a simple flag on XHR" to lets create a whole new API... -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
