On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Reitbauer, Alois
<alois.reitba...@compuware.com> wrote:
> The conversations this week were very helpful in deciding how to move 
> forward. I second Jatinder's idea that we come up with a specification that 
> describes in details what we need. We should also treat it as a separate 
> specification. If we then see that it has enough commonalities with XHR and 
> does not introduce unnecessary complexity we can still merge it.  I also 
> think that this is the most efficient way to move forward here.

It's not entirely clear to me how we moved from "we need a simple flag
on XHR" to lets create a whole new API...


Reply via email to