On 9/13/13 10:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote:
OK, fwiw I think I agree. The next question is whether they should be
generic in the elements of the collection or not too.
I don't really follow this. Are you talking about
Element.prototype.query? That should probably mimic other methods on
Element for now. Until we figure out the branding story and
subclassing etc.
I mean whether the generic code does myarr[i].querySelectorAll() or
whether it does CanonicalElementProto.querySelectorAll.call(myArr[i]) or
whether it does
CanonicalElementProto.canonicalQuerySelectorAll.call(myArr[i]), going in
order from most generic to least generic. Or something else.
Well you said things were broken. I was wondering what the extent of
the brokenness was.
I said underspecified, right?
I think we've covered the various underspecification bits in this thread
already: there's the question of how to get items from the collection
and the question of how to get new collections from the items.
-Boris
