On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance and, on >> reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like caja in the >> interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those use-cases from >> experience. > > I think Maciej explains fairly well in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1364.html > why it's good to have. Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements, > which I thought was one of the things we are trying to solve here.
Stay after class and write 100 times on the board: "Type 2 is not a security boundary". ~TJ
