On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance and, on > reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like caja in the > interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those use-cases from > experience.
I think Maciej explains fairly well in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1364.html why it's good to have. Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements, which I thought was one of the things we are trying to solve here. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
