Tab,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:09:33 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell <[email protected]>
Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance
and, onreflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like
caja in the interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those
use-cases from experience.
I think Maciej explains fairly well in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1364.html
why it's good to have. Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements,
which I thought was one of the things we are trying to solve here.
Stay after class and write 100 times on the board: "Type 2 is not a
security boundary".
This is not appropriate on this email list.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
[email protected] Find more at http://yandex.com
