During this CfC, Jonas submitted some comments to this list starting
with the following:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0531.html>
Jonas - did Mounir's responses adequately address your comments or is
there something you propose be done before LCWD is published?
There were also comments by Anne on Github (see [1]) and as I understand
it, those comments were addressed by Mounir. Anne - would you please
confirm if your comments have been adequately addressed?
-Thanks, ArtB
[1] https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/commits/gh-pages
On 9/11/14 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen
Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the
latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis:
<https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/>
The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement and
the Editors propose these Issues not be addressed for this first
version of the spec:
<https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues>
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process
Document used by this group states the following regarding the
significance/meaning of a LCWD:
[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document)
in the Working Draft;
* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
dependencies with other groups;
* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement
is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the
technical report to later maturity levels.
]]
If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them
to public-webapps @ w3.org by September 18 at the latest. Positive
response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as
agreement with the proposal.
The proposed review period is 4 weeks.
Assuming this CfC passes, if there are any specific groups (e.g.
script-coord, TAG, WAI, Privacy IG, Security IG, Mobile IG, etc.) or
external SDOs we should explicitly ask to review the LCWD, please let
us know.
-Thanks, AB
