On September 18, 2014 at 6:53:38 AM, Mounir Lamouri (mou...@lamouri.fr) wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, at 08:28, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > I think it's likely to result in many implementation bugs if we rely > > on this being defined buried inside an algorithm rather than at least > > mentioned at the definition of the property. > > I think it's good feedback. I could probably make this more visible. > Would you mind opening an issue marked as "Enhancement" and may go with > a proposal of what you believe would be easier to find. I don't want to > have you do the editor work but given that the problem isn't that the > information is missing but that it is not well exposed, fresh eyes would > be better to help with that ;) Filed: https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues/79
- CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline Se... Arthur Barstow
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; de... Jonas Sicking
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API... Jonas Sicking
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API... Mounir Lamouri
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation... Jonas Sicking
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orienta... Mounir Lamouri
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Or... Marcos Caceres
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API... Lars Knudsen
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; de... Arthur Barstow
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation... Marcos Caceres
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orienta... chaals
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Or... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Scree... chaals
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Scree... Arthur Barstow
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of S... Mounir Lamouri
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of S... Mounir Lamouri