On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:30 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the absence of any clear rationale, "It might change somehow" is 
> effectively "FUD", much as "someone might have IPR" is. So while you are 
> technically correct that a technology and its specification can change, that 
> is effectively irrelevant.

Before you start calling FUD, you might want to read up on my comment
and the replies I got before you start spreading some of your own. It
effectively comes down to the fact that the specification describes
something, but Chrome implements it in another way per how I suggested
it should work (using "animation frame tasks").


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Reply via email to