On 14 June 2015 at 01:41, Patrick H. Lauke <re...@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> it makes more sense to work on stylability of standard elements.

I'd like to keep the is="" construct (or better name) in the knowledge
that it's a stopgap for v1, and put our energies we're currently
expending debating this into styling standard elements - which is
currently being considered http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-forms/


Reply via email to