From: Bruce Lawson [] 
Sent: 15 June 2015 09:46

On 14 June 2015 at 01:41, Patrick H. Lauke <> wrote:
> it makes more sense to work on stylability of standard elements.

I'd like to keep the is="" construct (or better name) in the knowledge that 
it's a stopgap for v1, and put our energies we're currently expending debating 
this into styling standard elements - which is currently being considered

Will leaving is= (or whatever we call it) in situ create backward compatibility 
problems later on if/when it changes? 

That aside, concentrating efforts on styling native HTML elements makes a lot 
of sense.


Léonie Watson - Senior accessibility engineer
@LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup

Reply via email to