On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Bruce Lawson <bru...@opera.com> wrote:
> On 14 June 2015 at 01:41, Patrick H. Lauke <re...@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
>> it makes more sense to work on stylability of standard elements.
> I'd like to keep the is="" construct (or better name) in the knowledge
> that it's a stopgap for v1, and put our energies we're currently
> expending debating this into styling standard elements - which is
> currently being considered http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-forms/

Why should we standardize a stopgap?


Reply via email to