> On 01 Sep 2015, at 14:27, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yves,
> On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as 
>>>> TR/WebIDL/, and let -1 -2 … -n be pointers to the stable version
>>>> (aka, what is implemented, not what has to be implemented).
>>> Who do you propose will construct such a "what is implemented" 
>>> specification, and what useful work would you have them drop for
>>> it?
>> Well, we need tests, of course. There is a test suite that needs to
>> be checked again, and lots of other specs have tests that actually
>> test parts of WebIDL. So apart from new functionalities that don’t
>> have test yet (and may by mean of other specs testing those), most of
>> the work is to gather existing tests, and I am ready to help on that.
>> So I don’t ask anyone to stop doing their usual job, especially as it
>> can also help here. Of course people reviewing tests is always a nice
>> feature, as you know.
> I'm not sure I understand your point. Tests will need to be written and
> reviewed, whether "what is implemented" specifications are published or
> not. My question is specifically about the editing of the documents you
> propose to publish as -1 -2 … -n.
As far as editing goes, the editors for level-1 are Travis and myself. No work 
is required from Boris and Cameron.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.


Reply via email to