> On 01 Sep 2015, at 14:27, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Yves, > > On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >>>> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as >>>> TR/WebIDL/, and let -1 -2 … -n be pointers to the stable version >>>> (aka, what is implemented, not what has to be implemented). >>>> >>> >>> Who do you propose will construct such a "what is implemented" >>> specification, and what useful work would you have them drop for >>> it? >>> >> >> Well, we need tests, of course. There is a test suite that needs to >> be checked again, and lots of other specs have tests that actually >> test parts of WebIDL. So apart from new functionalities that don’t >> have test yet (and may by mean of other specs testing those), most of >> the work is to gather existing tests, and I am ready to help on that. >> So I don’t ask anyone to stop doing their usual job, especially as it >> can also help here. Of course people reviewing tests is always a nice >> feature, as you know. >> > > I'm not sure I understand your point. Tests will need to be written and > reviewed, whether "what is implemented" specifications are published or > not. My question is specifically about the editing of the documents you > propose to publish as -1 -2 … -n. > As far as editing goes, the editors for level-1 are Travis and myself. No work is required from Boris and Cameron.
-- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves