> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi Yves,
> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as 
>> TR/WebIDL/, and let -1 -2 … -n be pointers to the stable version 
>> (aka, what is implemented, not what has to be implemented).
> Who do you propose will construct such a "what is implemented"
> specification, and what useful work would you have them drop for it?

Well, we need tests, of course. There is a test suite that needs to be checked 
and lots of other specs have tests that actually test parts of WebIDL. 
So apart from new functionalities that don’t have test yet (and may by mean of 
other specs testing those), most of the work is to gather existing tests, and I 
am ready to help on that. So I don’t ask anyone to stop doing their usual job, 
especially as it can also help here.
Of course people reviewing tests is always a nice feature, as you know.

> Thanks
> Ms2ger
> NV5VSxq1H2aHv6rdRiBNygeGzEiwENZUnIzv0r0ebQMCRCvhwXqbm+srV9FlFNdb
> dJ7c41cXNHIk4D1+18vYvK4AenqkHE5zozm4LqoZ8SL+YLRFYyIhpXOsV34R5DnP
> wjyLcEbcFgWmYK2TXTNphhTXEmebM89o4vmGkrKPdYqAwWaWNJz5L6hMZARH7lWq
> eYL0iwo9BQbIfR0gLIpuARvS2oOS0Y7/8gNkMuEQ4h9UHa+hcvsOL0JWI6Zz2vTM
> ZNO3nAE1h5In6DFXmK3ZkIlOpIGgsVsK7KmiIKlvZAOZ9NXui851uYA9j2YQQ3U=
> =ixCO

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.


Reply via email to