I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the intended change to the spec yet, and so it could be immature to include in a "CR". (Does CR require at least 2 implementors exist?)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Vincent Scheib <sch...@google.com> wrote: > I've discussed more with Xiaoqian and Léonie and support a CR now with > this proposal: > > Move to a CR for the v1 Pointer Lock specification without Shadow DOM > changes, and a note on accessibility. Implementations are nearly consistent > for v1 and it can move to a published status sooner. We can follow up with > a v2 requiring more implementation work afterwards. > > -- Takayoshi Kochi
