I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the
intended change to the spec yet,
and so it could be immature to include in a "CR".   (Does CR require at
least 2 implementors exist?)

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Vincent Scheib <sch...@google.com> wrote:

> I've discussed more with Xiaoqian and Léonie and support a CR now with
> this proposal:
> Move to a CR for the v1 Pointer Lock specification without Shadow DOM
> changes, and a note on accessibility. Implementations are nearly consistent
> for v1 and it can move to a published status sooner. We can follow up with
> a v2 requiring more implementation work afterwards.

Takayoshi Kochi

Reply via email to