I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand the nature or purpose of your question, so I'm not sure how to effectively answer it.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Scott Rea <[email protected]> wrote: > G'day Ryan, > > I think I must have missed the "general agreement" posts on the list. > Minor changes are the discretion of ballot producers and endorsers, did > this "general agreement" you are referring to happen off list? Who was > involved in the "general agreement" process? > > Regards, > -Scott > > On 2/13/2017 11:05 AM, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Dean Coclin via Public > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Minor changes to ballots have traditionally been allowed in the > > forum. "Minor" has been left to the discretion of the ballot > > producer/endorsers but we've seldom seen controversy over that. > > > > > > It seems that there's general agreement that postponing the effective > > date represents a 'minor' change, for purposes of Ballot formation, and > > does not require restarting the discussion and/or voting periods. To > > that end, I will repost to the public list a revised form which takes > > into Gerv's remarks about what an appropriate _Baseline_ requirement is. > > Recognizing that such proposals are inherently a baseline, rather than > > best practice, and recognizing that different browsers / root stores may > > have more stringent security requirements, it doesn't undermine the > > Ballot to acknowledge that, but neither should it be seen as an > > endorsement that this is the 'best practice' timeframe for deployment. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Public mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > > > > -- > Scott Rea, MSc, CISSP > Ph# (801) 874-4114 >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
