On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Scott Rea <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just a process question Ryan, trying to understand how the CAB processes > work... > > I understand that minor changes are at the discretion of ballot > producers and endorsers, and you have posted an update to this ballot > under that pretext - my question is just about how the "minor" > designation is arrived at by the producers and endorsers. > > You indicated that there was "...general agreement that postponing the > effective date represents a 'minor' change", but I only saw Gerv's post > and then you made the change. So my question is about how that "general > agreement" process itself works? If the general agreeing happened on > list between a number of community members, then perhaps I am not seeing > the full list digest. Or did you mean the general agreeing (on the > designation that this was minor) was just you and Gerv and happened > offlist? > > To be clear, I have no issue with the changes for this ballot, just > trying to understand in a general sense for future ballots how this > minor designation process works. > > Regards, > _Scott > As Dean captured in https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-February/009621.html , and as previously discussed in https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/2017-January/009276.html , it seems there's consensus that there's nothing preventing modifications, but there's also no formal specification for any of this.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
