On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Peter - I'm always interested in what you have to say.  You ask me what
> I'm not understanding.  I guess I will ask you -- what is unclear about the
> following part of Ballot 190?
>
Kirk, It's not a matter of clarity of intent. It's about the
inappropriateness of how it attempts to reflect that intent. That's what
you seem to not be understanding.

You call it a roadblock, but to be clear, you're actively opposing
improving security. Can you explain why you are opposed to security?
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to