> On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Like we talked about at the recent F2F in Raleigh, I'd love to see a world
> where we can slowly move to consistent CP/CPSes. This is especially important
> for efforts like the CCADB with Microsoft's help, or the BR self-assessments
> that Mozilla's requesting.
>
> You can see the initial proposed edits at
> https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/3/files
> <https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/3/files> , along with
> explanations for the motivations for these.
Am I correct that you are using “MUST be structured in accordance with RFC
3647” as short hand for “MUST include all the section headings specified in the
outline in RFC 3647 section 6”? Should it say that sections without
subordinate headings and without content need to specify “No stipulation” or is
that too specific?
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
