On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Peter Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Like we talked about at the recent F2F in Raleigh, I'd love to see a world > where we can slowly move to consistent CP/CPSes. This is especially > important for efforts like the CCADB with Microsoft's help, or the BR > self-assessments that Mozilla's requesting. > > You can see the initial proposed edits at https://github.com/sleevi/ > cabforum-docs/pull/3/files , along with explanations for the motivations > for these. > > > Am I correct that you are using “MUST be structured in accordance with > RFC 3647” as short hand for “MUST include all the section headings > specified in the outline in RFC 3647 section 6”? Should it say that > sections without subordinate headings and without content need to specify > “No stipulation” or is that too specific? >
That's a great point. Certainly, the intent is that all the section headings are present, in the same order and with the prescribed content/topic of discussion. I'd love to hear from others, but I actually think "No stipulation" is a useful and valuable addition.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
