On 04/05/17 16:20, Ben Wilson wrote: > 1 - Does this ballot rule out “vanity CAs” – CAs with customer names in > the subject field, even though the key is held by the root CA? (I can > provide further clarification, and/or examples, if necessary.
I don't think so. It doesn't mandate the contents of the CN field other than a SHOULD-based uniqueness constraint. > 2- What is the full current wording of Ballot 199? It is as posted on 25th April, but with a MUST changed to a SHOULD. I will send out a full copy. Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
