Entrust votes Yes to ballot 199. Bruce.
-----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 12:29 PM To: CABFPub <[email protected]> Cc: Gervase Markham <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 199 - Require commonName in Root and Intermediate Certificates Following discussion on the call today, there is a minor edit to this ballot: On 25/04/17 16:03, Gervase Markham wrote: > 7.1.4.3.1 Subject Distinguished Name Fields > > Certificate Field: subject:commonName (OID 2.5.4.3) > Required/Optional: Required > Contents: This field MUST be present and the contents MUST be an > identifier --> change the second MUST to a SHOULD. (Which means this should be normal practice, but you can do something different if you have a good reason and know what you are doing.) Later, this may be replaced (in another ballot) with a MUST plus a set of known sensible use case exceptions. > for the certificate such that the certificate's Name is unique across > all certificates issued by the issuing certificate. Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
