Why do you think it’s detrimental to discussion – I don’t follow your logic?
From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com] Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:49 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org> Cc: Kirk Hall <kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Send us you list of current problems with the Network Security Guidelines On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>> wrote: Bruce and I will combine all suggestions received and report anonymously to the whole group for a discussion in Berlin. That seems pretty detrimental to discussion - that is, the anonymous aspect - unless we're talking about specific audit failures. Could you go into detail why this would be beneficial for discussion?
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
