I would love to respond, but I can’t respond until I understand the underlying 
reasons for your objections.  What are they?

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 8:06 PM
To: Kirk Hall <kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Send us you list of current problems with 
the Network Security Guidelines

Kirk,

This is not helpful or productive. Should I take your response to mean that you 
do not wish to engage with or answer the question, which was hopefully both 
simple and clear, which was simply trying to understand why, given the 
problems, you would propose anonymity? Understanding your reasoning, and the 
things you considered in proposing it, is entirely based in good faith, and I 
hope you can extend the same courtesies.

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Kirk Hall 
<kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com<mailto:kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>> wrote:
Actually, Ryan – you go first.  Why did you object?

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com<mailto:sle...@google.com>]
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 12:37 PM
To: Kirk Hall 
<kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com<mailto:kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>>
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List 
<public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Send us you list of current problems with 
the Network Security Guidelines

Hi Kirk,

While I realize your reply was seeking for more clarification, I think it's 
important to note that you didn't actually engage with the question I asked. 
I'm hoping to ask again - could you go into detail why this would be beneficial 
for discussion?

Thanks

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Kirk Hall 
<kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com<mailto:kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>> wrote:
Why do you think it’s detrimental to discussion – I don’t follow your logic?

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sle...@google.com<mailto:sle...@google.com>]
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:49 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List 
<public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>>
Cc: Kirk Hall 
<kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com<mailto:kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Send us you list of current problems with the 
Network Security Guidelines



On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Kirk Hall via Public 
<public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>> wrote:
Bruce and I will combine all suggestions received and report anonymously to the 
whole group for a discussion in Berlin.

That seems pretty detrimental to discussion - that is, the anonymous aspect - 
unless we're talking about specific audit failures.

Could you go into detail why this would be beneficial for discussion?


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to