On 27/10/17 09:42, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > In any event, that at least hopefully captures the challenge, and why > the 'simple' solution is likely not as simple as it appears.
So what's the solution? Is there any way to allow SRVnames without simultaneously making all our TCSCs no longer fully technically constrained? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
