On 15/11/17 11:34, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > Another option is to introduce some further signal to indicate that > 'this' SRVName is safe to trust. This was the proposal I sketched out > for you.
Yes, I understand. How is that proposal to be progressed? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
