On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27/10/17 09:42, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > > In any event, that at least hopefully captures the challenge, and why > > the 'simple' solution is likely not as simple as it appears. > > So what's the solution? Is there any way to allow SRVnames without > simultaneously making all our TCSCs no longer fully technically > constrained? > I gave an option immediately preceding the text you snipped, along with the trade-offs such options come with.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
