On 08/12/17 18:17, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > Just putting the question to you in the abstract – do you think we > should have to restart a seven day discussion just to correct an obvious > typo?
Let us say the answer to that question is "no". Then the obvious next question is: "how do you, the proponent of this idea, define 'obvious typo' in a way which does not open the door to substantive changes, or changes which people would argue about the substantiveness of, and without inventing Yet Another Voting/Polling Mechanism"? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
