Gerv, this started as your ballot, so it's up to you - do you want to allow such minor edits without restarting the discussion period, or not?
If yes, you need to put defining / permissive language in the ballot. I won't be comfortable if we have no written permission for edits, but then allow them informally later when ballots have errors - it needs to be in the ballot. -----Original Message----- From: Gervase Markham [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 1:23 PM To: Kirk Hall <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]>; Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]> Cc: Virginia Fournier <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Ballot XXX: Update Discussion Period On 08/12/17 18:17, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > Just putting the question to you in the abstract – do you think we > should have to restart a seven day discussion just to correct an > obvious typo? Let us say the answer to that question is "no". Then the obvious next question is: "how do you, the proponent of this idea, define 'obvious typo' in a way which does not open the door to substantive changes, or changes which people would argue about the substantiveness of, and without inventing Yet Another Voting/Polling Mechanism"? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
