> On Oct 16, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Again, I'm afraid you're misunderstanding, but I can hope that members on the > list and following the discussion will not be confused.
As a member on the list and following the discussion, I have no idea what objections you actually have to the proposed wording. My impression is that you think that perhaps the Bylaws will be changed in a way which leads to IPR consequences, but I cannot imagine what consequences you think there might be, nor can I see how having the form of a Working Group instead of a subcommittee makes any difference. It is not clear to me that a Working Group can produce changes to the Bylaws. I would suggest that 5.3.3(a) might have been intended to be an exclusive description of the output of a Working Group.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
