-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/8/09 10:25 AM, Robin Collier wrote:
[wow, your mail client does strange threading] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:13:23 -0400 > Subject: Re: [PubSub] Timestamp on items and versioning > > Do you have some specific need for generic time stamps on all PubSub > items regardless of context? > > I gave several reasons for its inclusion in the original request, so I > will just link to it here > <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/pubsub/2009-May/date.html>, > where the original thread started. > > In addition to what was listed in the original thread, it can be used to > synchronize the > order of actions when doing a get items and an item from the same node > is deleted. > There is no way to currently know if the same item received in the get > has actually > been deleted or not. Given that you're interested in timestamps on items that are retrieved after the fact, it's not clear to me why a delayed delivery notation (XEP-0203) would not solve the problem. There are examples of this in XEP-0060. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqxZ+AACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwUQgCcCcnvxxbJW5czY7vzXFkxUiL7 Lf8AnA0IwSTDTaqsHbwwCUCbUvfQNcOL =gP8P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
