Re: [PubSub] Timestamp on items and versioning

[Robin Collier]

> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:32:33 +0100
> From: ke...@kismith.co.uk
> To: pubsub@xmpp.org
> Subject: Re: [PubSub] Timestamp on items and versioning
> 
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote:
> >>> There is no bug in this case, but the ordering problem still exists.
> > OK, you've convinced me. :)
> 
> I'm not convinced yet - whenever people use words like 'timestamps'
> and 'uniqueness' together, I start getting twitchy. I'll re-read this
> thread and see if it convinces me on the second time through :)
> 
> /K

This is me, banging head on keyboard.

8-)


Please remember, I am suggesting that the combination of timestamp and 
item id is unique, not the timestamp itself.  The item id is already unique for 
a 
node, but can be reused.  This just insures that multiple publications of that 
item are unique from each other.
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Create a cool, new character for your Windows Live™ Messenger. 
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9656621