> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:34:08 -0600
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PubSub] Timestamp on items and versioning
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/8/09 10:25 AM, Robin Collier wrote:
>
> [wow, your mail client does strange threading]
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:13:23 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [PubSub] Timestamp on items and versioning
> >
> > Do you have some specific need for generic time stamps on all PubSub
> > items regardless of context?
> >
>> > I gave several reasons for its inclusion in the original request, so I
>> > will just link to it here
>> > <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/pubsub/2009-May/date.html>,
>> > where the original thread started.
>> >
>> > In addition to what was listed in the original thread, it can be used to
>> > synchronize the
>> > order of actions when doing a get items and an item from the same node
>> > is deleted.
>> > There is no way to currently know if the same item received in the get
>> > has actually
>> > been deleted or not.
>
> Given that you're interested in timestamps on items that are retrieved
> after the fact, it's not clear to me why a delayed delivery notation
> (XEP-0203) would not solve the problem. There are examples of this in
> XEP-0060.
>
That only works on notifications, and even then is only appropriate when
there is only a single <item> since it applies to the contents of <items> as
a whole. To work on a list of items being returned from a request, it would
have to be included with each item, which the current schema for item does
not allow.
Should I summarize all the information that has been discussed so far. There
has been a fair bit of discussion on this topic.
[My client seems fail to insert > for the reply message in some cases so I
have to do it manually - this one worked fine though :-) ]
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkqxZ+AACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwUQgCcCcnvxxbJW5czY7vzXFkxUiL7
> Lf8AnA0IwSTDTaqsHbwwCUCbUvfQNcOL
> =gP8P
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_________________________________________________________________
Internet explorer 8 lets you browse the web faster.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9655582
